| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
|
||||
|
ChuckH is a member here, and he recently dug into the Zumo vs: 276/376/378 vs: 26xx/28xx and hopefully will jump in here with his findings. I think one of the big strikes against the Zumo is screen resolution.
I'm pretty happy with my 276C. I'd be happier if it took standard CF cards instead of that damn expensive proprietary Garmin memory card. My friend Phil is putting up a GPS information Website (coming Real Soon Now ) and knows a ton about Garmins (having worked at Cycoactive and Touratech). He reminded me that you can use the GPS to find motels at the end of a long day when you're tired, hot and grouchy. Who'd a guessed?
|
|
|||
|
Don't think it supports saved track logs. Saved track logs are a requirement for me. I'm waiting for Garmin to wake up and give us an instrument that matches what the Lowrance Baja 480C can do. 100 saved track logs of 10,000 points each. Garmin claims the Zumo was created by motorcyclists... I'm betting the Tavern-to-Tavern 2k per year or less motorcyclists.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
I had a 276C for over 2 years and liked it alot. I sold it recently thinking to replace it with either a 376C or a 378. Butt, I'm holding off just a bit. Why? The 276C and the 376C/378/478 units share the same chip set, which, is a generation behind the Zumo. I don't plan to purchase the Zumo. I like the Chartplotter units from Garmin. The screen resolution is excellent, and, I believe the screen size is pretty much ideal for a motorcycle application. If Garmin doesn't announce a replacement for the 276C/376C/378/478 by this December, then I'll purchase a 378. It's spendy in order to get the North American City Navigator basemap and you have to pay for that darn GXM30 antenna. Butt, once you do, then you don't have to fsck with Garmin proprietary memory or wondering if you have the NA CN basemap detail in order to locate a Subway in West L.A. And, I can eliminate my (faultless, so far) Roady XM radio and have one less electronic device on my bike. I do like the user interface on the Garmin 2820, butt, I like the screen of the 276C/... chartplotter's a lot better, it's resolution is significantly better then the Zumo and the 28?0 series units. SiRFstarIII is the chipset that (will be) is used on the Zumo and not yet found on the WAAS capable 276C/... series chartplotters. And, why has Garmin waited so long to begin retailing the Zumo? Is 5 months a bit long for a product intro? BTW, my trusty Garmin III+ booted up and located satellites much faster then my 276C. A 578 Chartplotter with SiRfstarIII and Bluetooth would be sweet. Last edited by chuckh; 09-Oct-2006 at 08:00 PM (042). |
|
||||
|
Thanks for all the replies, guys!
So far: 1. No track logs - Does this mean I can't wander around randomly and then save what I did in case I like it and want to make a "route" out of it to use in the future? 2. Resolution & Screen size - I need to go into a shop that has many units and see them side by side, I guess. All I really know is my GPSMap 60C, which I am guessing falls into the small screen and poor resolution group? |
|
||||
|
Thanks for the comma Chuck.
Quote:
Quote:
My wish list would also include the following: - a waterproof remote of some kind, especially one I could mount on the handlebars. - a definable hotkey so I could switch between City Nav and Topo with one button push, for example. - larger map segment limits. Even the 60 series has twice the 276C limits. Phil |
|
|||
|
Had a Quest, very tough to see with my 46 year old eyes. Wife surprized me with a Zumo. So far it is the coolest thing I've seen, I love the touch screen and the large screen is great too! Still learning what it can do but looks great on my 07 GS!
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |